| |
Low
Probably not a WebQuest |
Medium
A solid draft |
High
Ready for Blue Web'n |
| Engaging Opening |
No attempt made to appeal to learners. |
Honestly attempts to appeal to student interests. |
Has that something that compels attention. |
The Question / Task
|
Fuzzy Question or Task. Maybe what's asked for
is lower level thinking. |
The Question and Task target higher order thinking,
but may not be totally clear. |
Clear Question and Task. These naturally flow
from the introduction and signal a direction for learning. |
Background for Everyone
|
No attempt to access prior learning or build common background. |
Some mention of addressing a common body of knowledge. (May not
happen within the activity.) |
Clearly calls attention to the need for a common foundation of
knowledge and provides needed (Web?) resources. |
Roles / Expertise
|
Roles are artificial or not requiring interdependent
teamwork. |
Roles are clear. They may be limited in scope. |
Roles match the issues and resources. The roles
provide multiple perspectives from which to view the topic. |
Use of the Web
|
This activity could probably be done better without the Web. |
Some resources reflect features of the Web that make it particularly
useful. |
Uses the Web to access at least some of the following: interactivity,
multiple perspectives, current information, etc. |
Transformative Thinking
|
No Transformative thinking. (This is not a WebQuest,
but may be a good Treasure Hunt). |
Higher level thinking is required, but the process
for students may not be clear. |
Higher level thinking required to construct new
meaning. Scaffolding is clearly provided to support student achievment. |
Real World Feedback
|
No feedback loop included. |
The learning product could easily be used for authentic assessment
although this may not be mentioned. |
Some feedback loop is included in the Web page. May include a
rubric. |
Conclusion
|
Minimal conclusion. No mention of student thinking
or symmetry to intro. |
Sums up the experiences and learning that was
undertaken. Probably returns to the intro ideas.
|
Clear tie-in to the intro. Makes the students'
cognitive tasks overt and suggests how this learning could transfer
to other domains/issues. |